<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Property sales likely to pick up in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>i forgot to add that i was a cash buyer and had $66.000 in cash $54.000 for the deposit and $12.000 to cover the credit card debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i forgot to add that i was a cash buyer and had $66.000 in cash $54.000 for the deposit and $12.000 to cover the credit card debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>I bought a 3 bedroom house in clouston park upper hutt for $252.000.The bank evalued the house at time of purchase at $275.000 so im in positive equity.I bought the house in december 2008 on the %20 deposit i put down $54.000 and was hedging $12.000 credit card debt.The house had a new bathroom and kitchen put in a 1960s house.Im in my 40s and was lucky to get in as i was the lowest bidder out of 2 of us the vendor gave it to me because i was a first home buyer.The previous couple before me failed on finance.What hasnt been mention here is that banks now look at your passed spending history ie not paying power or telephone bill on time like i did.I want to sell once the market picks up because id like to move to a warmer place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a 3 bedroom house in clouston park upper hutt for $252.000.The bank evalued the house at time of purchase at $275.000 so im in positive equity.I bought the house in december 2008 on the %20 deposit i put down $54.000 and was hedging $12.000 credit card debt.The house had a new bathroom and kitchen put in a 1960s house.Im in my 40s and was lucky to get in as i was the lowest bidder out of 2 of us the vendor gave it to me because i was a first home buyer.The previous couple before me failed on finance.What hasnt been mention here is that banks now look at your passed spending history ie not paying power or telephone bill on time like i did.I want to sell once the market picks up because id like to move to a warmer place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Examining facts on the state of the real estate market - Unconditional - The impartial voice of the New Zealand Real Estate industry</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Examining facts on the state of the real estate market - Unconditional - The impartial voice of the New Zealand Real Estate industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] for this is the subject of a blog post written on the Zoodle blog in January titled &#8220;Property sales likely to pick up in 2009&#8221; which I would encourage a review for insight into the relative state of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for this is the subject of a blog post written on the Zoodle blog in January titled &#8220;Property sales likely to pick up in 2009&#8221; which I would encourage a review for insight into the relative state of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brader</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-71</guid>
		<description>The median house price chart at interest.co.nz which can be accessed by clicking my name shows that most districts of NZ have seen prices double or close to it since 2003. Interestingly Auckland and Wellington have not been the standout performers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The median house price chart at interest.co.nz which can be accessed by clicking my name shows that most districts of NZ have seen prices double or close to it since 2003. Interestingly Auckland and Wellington have not been the standout performers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Helm</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-69</guid>
		<description>David

Really appreciate your perspective and input - valuable to hear as you say from the coal face! - not sure as to the likelihood of short term price appreciation.

I had certainly heard that whilst 20% is the starting point for bank as ever everything is up for negotiation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David</p>
<p>Really appreciate your perspective and input &#8211; valuable to hear as you say from the coal face! &#8211; not sure as to the likelihood of short term price appreciation.</p>
<p>I had certainly heard that whilst 20% is the starting point for bank as ever everything is up for negotiation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-68</guid>
		<description>on the 20% deposit front. I have had further talks with mortgage brokers and an ANZ banking person. 20% deposit is becoming the norm  but there are still options for low deposit borrowers. A manager from NZ home loans told me today that she can still get loans with a 5% deposit approved (with conditions!) and she has just lost her ability to get 100% financing approved last week.  Kiwibank has a good starter package where they require 15% deposit but this can be gifted  - see link http://www.kiwibank.co.nz/personal-banking/home-loans/why-kiwibank/welcome-homeloan.asp

There is also the obvious option of getting someone to guarantee the loan. What better way is there for a parent or a grandparent to help out their child/grandchild. No money needed, just equity... Bet there will alot of this going on in the next few years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the 20% deposit front. I have had further talks with mortgage brokers and an ANZ banking person. 20% deposit is becoming the norm  but there are still options for low deposit borrowers. A manager from NZ home loans told me today that she can still get loans with a 5% deposit approved (with conditions!) and she has just lost her ability to get 100% financing approved last week.  Kiwibank has a good starter package where they require 15% deposit but this can be gifted  &#8211; see link <a href="http://www.kiwibank.co.nz/personal-banking/home-loans/why-kiwibank/welcome-homeloan.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.kiwibank.co.nz/personal-banking/home-loans/why-kiwibank/welcome-homeloan.asp</a></p>
<p>There is also the obvious option of getting someone to guarantee the loan. What better way is there for a parent or a grandparent to help out their child/grandchild. No money needed, just equity&#8230; Bet there will alot of this going on in the next few years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I would tend to agree with your summary.
The feeling currently at the coal face in my area of focus (Wellington&#039;s Northern Suburbs) is one of cautious optimism. Certainly, the recent and continuing interest rate drops has stimulated the first home buying market. Open homes are filling up again and homes that have been sitting for a few months are now selling. On the other hand, there are very few homes coming into the market place at present which points to a potential lift in prices in the short term as demand begins to outstrip supply. The supply of money is the one thing that is holding many young purchasers back even though they want to buy. Just yesterday I had a buyer out and looking and he mentioned that his bank of choice not only required a 20% deposit but also required that he had lived at the same address for three years AND had worked for the same employer for three years! I can understand it as a measure of stability, but how staying in the same house affects your potential to pay back a loan I don&#039;t know... I would hope to see the knee jerk reaction that many banking institutions are demonstrating will ease off in the medium term</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to agree with your summary.<br />
The feeling currently at the coal face in my area of focus (Wellington&#8217;s Northern Suburbs) is one of cautious optimism. Certainly, the recent and continuing interest rate drops has stimulated the first home buying market. Open homes are filling up again and homes that have been sitting for a few months are now selling. On the other hand, there are very few homes coming into the market place at present which points to a potential lift in prices in the short term as demand begins to outstrip supply. The supply of money is the one thing that is holding many young purchasers back even though they want to buy. Just yesterday I had a buyer out and looking and he mentioned that his bank of choice not only required a 20% deposit but also required that he had lived at the same address for three years AND had worked for the same employer for three years! I can understand it as a measure of stability, but how staying in the same house affects your potential to pay back a loan I don&#8217;t know&#8230; I would hope to see the knee jerk reaction that many banking institutions are demonstrating will ease off in the medium term</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Helm</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Steve

An excellent contribution with valuable insight. Clearly there are a multitude of factors that effect a market like real estate, added to which real estate is actually only a market as an aggregate of thousands of individual actions.

Unlike commodity markets or product markets, real estate is not a homogeneous product driven by consistent market forces, every action in this market happens at a unique time for a unique property. That is why there is such varied opinion and equally why it is so hard to forecast trends.

My proposition is that there is no record of any developed western economy where a real estate market has stopped - there is always activity as there has been in the past 12 months - at a level half of the prior few years. Clearly in those active years there was a high degree of speculation which fuels more sales. My view is that sales levels will rise in 2009 (again prices I don&#039;t believe will rise - they are more than likely to fall), that is my opinion.

Rest assured this blog will be writing and to be honest more often reporting activity, statistics as will the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realestate.co.nz/blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unconditional blog&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realestate.co.nz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;realestate.co.nz&lt;/a&gt; website in 6 months time, 12 months time and 24 months time.

Out of interest one aspect of Zoodle which is at this stage (we have only been operating the site for 15 days) is not yet proven is that Zoodle&#039;s success as a property information website should not be significantly impacted by flat or buoyant markets. Property information and buying property reports should be as relevant in a buyers market as we are in now as well as a rampant sellers market as we saw a few years ago - so in theory there is no self serving element to this blog writing and forecast boom or bust!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve</p>
<p>An excellent contribution with valuable insight. Clearly there are a multitude of factors that effect a market like real estate, added to which real estate is actually only a market as an aggregate of thousands of individual actions.</p>
<p>Unlike commodity markets or product markets, real estate is not a homogeneous product driven by consistent market forces, every action in this market happens at a unique time for a unique property. That is why there is such varied opinion and equally why it is so hard to forecast trends.</p>
<p>My proposition is that there is no record of any developed western economy where a real estate market has stopped &#8211; there is always activity as there has been in the past 12 months &#8211; at a level half of the prior few years. Clearly in those active years there was a high degree of speculation which fuels more sales. My view is that sales levels will rise in 2009 (again prices I don&#8217;t believe will rise &#8211; they are more than likely to fall), that is my opinion.</p>
<p>Rest assured this blog will be writing and to be honest more often reporting activity, statistics as will the <a href="http://www.realestate.co.nz/blog" rel="nofollow">Unconditional blog</a> on the <a href="http://www.realestate.co.nz" rel="nofollow">realestate.co.nz</a> website in 6 months time, 12 months time and 24 months time.</p>
<p>Out of interest one aspect of Zoodle which is at this stage (we have only been operating the site for 15 days) is not yet proven is that Zoodle&#8217;s success as a property information website should not be significantly impacted by flat or buoyant markets. Property information and buying property reports should be as relevant in a buyers market as we are in now as well as a rampant sellers market as we saw a few years ago &#8211; so in theory there is no self serving element to this blog writing and forecast boom or bust!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, and interesting responses.
It seems to be a very self-seeking article - and I just don&#039;t see it happening.  (Why would a real estate website talk about declining sales in the future?)

I understand the difference you are making between price and volume - good that you have separated that and made that clear.
After this steep decline, it seems that the only way is up.
The assumption you have made is that we have reached the bottom.
Unfortunately Real estate activity is tied to our economic situation, which is by means clear - or finished.
There have been a number of interesting stories since you posted this article.  The biggest impact is the OCR decision on Thursday.  That&#039;s great news for mortgage and loan-holders, but it doesn&#039;t return the market to where it was - or even stabilise it.
Another article I saw stated that 70% of the worlds CEOs do not see a way out of the economic recession any time soon.  These are the guys who are in the business of knowing where they are going, and chasing the money.  If they haven&#039;t got an idea of when the tide turns, who does?

Yet another article out today is the Building consents have dropped to a 20 year low.  This isn&#039;t likely to rise rapidly.

@Ross - Banks DO have to justify who they loan to and higher deposits are now required.  You can say that it&#039;s a fallacy that Banks require a 20% deposit across the board - that might even be true.  For the majority of lenders - it&#039;s not true. 
Further - the majority of people ho have been in the market for more than 5 years - if they sell their house, they still have to buy in the same market.
You&#039;re using some very blanket stats - which nullifies hat you are saying.  SOME properties no doubt have increased 100% - not all.  Your area does not represent the rest of the country.
@Alastair - It&#039;s an emotional or irrational decision if you can afford it.
If you are smarter than that - it&#039;s really not.

I see the Real Estate market declining for a while yet - and then stagnating as people wait to see where things go with the economy.  We are not immune to this, although we probably aren&#039;t feeling the brunt of it like some others are.

Buying in a falling market is like trying to catch a sharp knife.

I&#039;d like to see a follow-up post to this post in 6 months time and in a years time - to keep you honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, and interesting responses.<br />
It seems to be a very self-seeking article &#8211; and I just don&#8217;t see it happening.  (Why would a real estate website talk about declining sales in the future?)</p>
<p>I understand the difference you are making between price and volume &#8211; good that you have separated that and made that clear.<br />
After this steep decline, it seems that the only way is up.<br />
The assumption you have made is that we have reached the bottom.<br />
Unfortunately Real estate activity is tied to our economic situation, which is by means clear &#8211; or finished.<br />
There have been a number of interesting stories since you posted this article.  The biggest impact is the OCR decision on Thursday.  That&#8217;s great news for mortgage and loan-holders, but it doesn&#8217;t return the market to where it was &#8211; or even stabilise it.<br />
Another article I saw stated that 70% of the worlds CEOs do not see a way out of the economic recession any time soon.  These are the guys who are in the business of knowing where they are going, and chasing the money.  If they haven&#8217;t got an idea of when the tide turns, who does?</p>
<p>Yet another article out today is the Building consents have dropped to a 20 year low.  This isn&#8217;t likely to rise rapidly.</p>
<p>@Ross &#8211; Banks DO have to justify who they loan to and higher deposits are now required.  You can say that it&#8217;s a fallacy that Banks require a 20% deposit across the board &#8211; that might even be true.  For the majority of lenders &#8211; it&#8217;s not true.<br />
Further &#8211; the majority of people ho have been in the market for more than 5 years &#8211; if they sell their house, they still have to buy in the same market.<br />
You&#8217;re using some very blanket stats &#8211; which nullifies hat you are saying.  SOME properties no doubt have increased 100% &#8211; not all.  Your area does not represent the rest of the country.<br />
@Alastair &#8211; It&#8217;s an emotional or irrational decision if you can afford it.<br />
If you are smarter than that &#8211; it&#8217;s really not.</p>
<p>I see the Real Estate market declining for a while yet &#8211; and then stagnating as people wait to see where things go with the economy.  We are not immune to this, although we probably aren&#8217;t feeling the brunt of it like some others are.</p>
<p>Buying in a falling market is like trying to catch a sharp knife.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see a follow-up post to this post in 6 months time and in a years time &#8211; to keep you honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brader</title>
		<link>http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/blog/property-sales-likely-to-pick-up-in-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoodle.co.nz/cms/?p=317#comment-53</guid>
		<description>John _ I have just re-read this thread - the comments say volume may improve and that prices will either stabilise or drop up to 5% further. No theme of price increases or defiance of worldwide trend present.

It is a fallacy that banks require 20% deposit across the board.

Only a small proportion of house buyers have a problem with deposits, generally first home buyers and the government shared equity scheme is helping them out.

The majority of people who own a home have owned for more than 5 years and not too worried about prices dropping 8% (QV latest figure) to 13% given that they have gone up 100% or more.

Just today I showed a past client a home - he purchased his current home from me for $290,000 10 years ago - that house is now worth at least $850,000 and now he is looking to upgrade. People who have been in the market for a long while have little to fear in my opinion and a stable or declining market is a great time to change house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John _ I have just re-read this thread &#8211; the comments say volume may improve and that prices will either stabilise or drop up to 5% further. No theme of price increases or defiance of worldwide trend present.</p>
<p>It is a fallacy that banks require 20% deposit across the board.</p>
<p>Only a small proportion of house buyers have a problem with deposits, generally first home buyers and the government shared equity scheme is helping them out.</p>
<p>The majority of people who own a home have owned for more than 5 years and not too worried about prices dropping 8% (QV latest figure) to 13% given that they have gone up 100% or more.</p>
<p>Just today I showed a past client a home &#8211; he purchased his current home from me for $290,000 10 years ago &#8211; that house is now worth at least $850,000 and now he is looking to upgrade. People who have been in the market for a long while have little to fear in my opinion and a stable or declining market is a great time to change house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

